Young v. United Parcel Service | |
---|---|
Argued December 3, 2014 Decided March 25, 2015 | |
Full case name | Peggy Young, Petitioner v. United Parcel Service, Inc. |
Docket no. | 12-1226 |
Citations | 575 U.S. 206 (more) 135 S. Ct. 1338; 191 L. Ed. 2d 279 |
Case history | |
Prior | 784 F.3d 192 (4th Cir. 2013) |
Holding | |
To bring a disparate treatment claim under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, a pregnant employee must show that the employer refused to provide accommodations and that the employer later provided accommodations to other employees with similar restrictions. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Breyer, joined by Roberts, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan |
Concurrence | Alito (in judgment) |
Dissent | Scalia, joined by Kennedy, Thomas |
Dissent | Kennedy |
Laws applied | |
Pregnancy Discrimination Act Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 |
Young v. United Parcel Service, 575 U.S. 206 (2015), is a United States Supreme Court case that the Court evaluated the requirements for bringing a disparate treatment claim under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act.[1] In a 6–3 decision, the Court held that to bring such a claim, a pregnant employee must show that their employer refused to provide accommodations and that the employer later provided accommodations to other employees with similar restrictions.[1] The Court then remanded the case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to determine whether the employer engaged in discrimination under this new test.[1]